NFL Previews 
MLB Previews 
NBA Previews 
NHL Previews 
Soccer Previews 
Longwood Lancers vs USC Upstate Spartans Picks and Predictions – Thursday January 29, 2026
Longwood heads to Spartanburg for a Big South spot that matters more than the records suggest. Tip is Thursday at 7:00 PM ET at the Hodge Center, and it’s on ESPN+. USC Upstate has been much steadier at home, while Longwood’s road form has been the soft spot that keeps showing up in the market.
The number is tight for a reason. Upstate is laying 3.5 with a total of 144.5, which points to a game where one or two possession swings decide it late, not a runaway. This is also the kind of matchup where free throws and defensive rebounds quietly decide whether the favorite closes or the dog hangs around.
Longwood Lancers vs USC Upstate Spartans Odds
These are the current betting lines, and bettors should monitor the updated college basketball odds for any late movement.
| Team | Moneyline | Spread | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Longwood Lancers | Not listed | +3.5 (-118) | O 144.5 |
| USC Upstate Spartans | Not listed | -3.5 (-102) | U 144.5 |
Longwood Lancers Betting Form
Longwood is 12-10 and coming in with a little momentum after a tight 81-79 win over Charleston Southern. The headline is that they can score in different ways. They’re efficient overall, finish well inside, and they pressure the rim enough to get whistles. That’s a real edge in conference games where the margin is thin and the pace can stall.
From a betting standpoint, their free-throw volume is the separator. Teams that consistently earn trips to the line tend to travel better than jump-shooting-only offenses, because you can stabilize possessions when shots aren’t falling. If this game is called tight, Longwood can play through it. If it’s loose and physical, the value shifts toward the home side that can win more empty trips.
USC Upstate Spartans Betting Form
USC Upstate is 9-13, but the home and road splits are doing a lot of work here. They’re 6-4 at the Hodge Center, and that matters because their scoring profile plays better with familiar rims and crowd energy. They also rebound well enough to control portions of the game that don’t show up in raw scoring averages, especially when the opponent isn’t an elite defensive rebounding group.
They’re coming off a 67-65 loss to Gardner-Webb, and that’s the kind of result that can go two ways. You either get a focused response at home, or you get the same late-game execution issues again, and those become brutal when you’re laying points. For a small favorite, you want clean late possessions, you want secure rebounds, and you want the free-throw edge. Anything else and you’re sweating a one-possession game.
Longwood Lancers vs USC Upstate Spartans Matchup Breakdown
This game is about shot selection versus possession control. Longwood’s efficiency inside and ability to draw fouls gives them a stable scoring base. Upstate’s best path is making Longwood work deeper into the clock and winning the “extra possession” battle with rebounds and forced misses that turn into runouts.
Turnovers are the quiet hinge. If Longwood is taking care of the ball, their interior scoring and free-throw pressure makes them hard to separate from. If they get sloppy, Upstate doesn’t need to shoot lights out to cover 3.5. They just need more shots, and ideally more free throws, because that’s how short favorites avoid the late-game coin flip.
The total at 144.5 is playable, but you need to think about how the last five minutes will look. If it’s close, you can get late fouling, extended possessions, and free points at the stripe. If one team is up 8-10 with two minutes left, you can also get a “dribble it out, trade twos” finish that bleeds the clock. The way to handicap that is to focus less on season scoring averages and more on possession count, free-throw rate, and end-game decision-making, which is exactly what the expert betting guide is built around.
Longwood Lancers vs USC Upstate Spartans Predictions and Best Bets
I lean Longwood +3.5. The number is small, and Longwood’s ability to get to the line is the type of skill that keeps you live on the road. Even if Upstate controls stretches, Longwood can keep scoring without needing a hot three-point night, and that’s what you want when you’re taking points.
The under 144.5 also makes sense if you’re expecting a half-court Big South grind with both teams trading physical possessions. Longwood can score, but the line is already elevated relative to the kind of game that often gets played when a modest home favorite is protecting a lead. If Upstate plays through the glass and slows the tempo, points get tougher.
The one thing that keeps me from making the under the primary play is the free-throw profile. Longwood lives at the stripe, and that can inflate totals even when the pace is mediocre. That’s why my stronger position is the spread: you can cash Longwood +3.5 even in a game where free throws push the total around.
Best Bet: Longwood +3.5 (-118)
NCAAB Picks and Handicappers on ScoresAndStats
If you’re building a bigger card, start with the daily college basketball picks and compare the arguments you like here against other similar spread ranges on the slate. That’s where you find whether this number is tight for a reason or simply shaded toward the home court narrative.
For more matchup context in the same format, the NCAAB previews hub is the quickest way to stay consistent across games, and the college basketball teams hub helps when you want to sanity-check how a team’s style travels.
If you care about who’s actually producing results, you can track performance through the best handicappers and the handicappers leaderboard. And if you want packaged plays rather than building everything from scratch, you can also buy picks and compare those positions to your own numbers.
For broader angles and betting concepts that translate across conferences, the main ScoresAndStats blog is useful, while the sportsbook reviews and handicappers sites reviews pages are where you pressure-test the books and services you’re using to place volume.
