William & Mary Tribe vs UTEP Miners picks and predictions November 24th 2025

Game Preview: UTEP Miners @ William & Mary Tribe

The UTEP Miners and William & Mary Tribe meet Monday afternoon at the John Hurst Adams Gymnasium in Jacksonville for a neutral-site nonconference matchup that pairs two offenses trending upward early in the season. The UTEP Miners enter at 3-2, while the William & Mary Tribe come in at 4-2 and laying -1.5 on the opening line.

This is one of several early-week matchups featured across the broader college hoops slate, and additional tournament context can be found on the NCAAB previews page. The total opens at 157.5, reflecting both teams’ offensive efficiency despite contrasting tempo profiles.

Odds and Key Information

William & Mary remains a slight favorite at -1.5, with early bettors leaning toward the Tribe due to their higher scoring metrics and faster pace. UTEP’s moneyline at near-even odds suggests market respect for the Miners’ physicality and improved scoring balance.

The total of 157.5 positions this as one of the higher projected-scoring matchups on Monday’s board. William & Mary’s consistent perimeter production aids that projection, while UTEP’s ability to get to the free-throw line boosts scoring expectancy. Early action has been split, with sharp indicators pointing slightly toward the under due to pace disparities.

Coaches from both sides stressed tempo control and shot-selection stability as key factors. Newly emerging contributors continue to round out rotations as early-season scheduling transitions into December preparation.

UTEP Miners Outlook

UTEP enters with momentum after an 84-83 win over St. Thomas (TX), a game in which Jamal West Jr. delivered 20 points and eight rebounds. His blend of size and scoring versatility remains essential, especially in neutral-site environments. Elijah Jones and Kaseem Watson also contributed 15 points each, giving UTEP a balanced scoring approach that relies on rim pressure and quick-strike secondary actions.

The Miners’ offensive profile is centered around efficiency inside the arc and generating foul-line opportunities. Their 25.4 free-throw attempts per game rank inside the national top 90, an indicator of consistent aggression. UTEP’s 46.7 percent shooting provides a solid baseline, though offensive lulls have surfaced when perimeter production drops. Marcus Hall’s steady scoring at 16 per game provides stability, particularly when UTEP is forced into half-court sets.

Pace remains the defining factor for UTEP, as their slower tempo protects their defensive structure. At just 48.6 possessions per game, they operate among the slowest teams nationally. Their ability to dictate rhythm is crucial against William & Mary’s faster style.

Defensively, the Miners focus on limiting transition opportunities and forcing contested midrange attempts. Their physicality around the rim often reduces second-chance points, though disciplined rotations are necessary against a Tribe team that moves the ball well. UTEP’s road concerns are noteworthy, but the neutral-site element provides stability compared to true away-floor dynamics.

Additional roster evaluation and team comparisons can be found through the NCAAB team directory and scoring breakdowns on the college basketball scores and odds board.

William & Mary Tribe Outlook

William & Mary continues to show dynamic scoring ability after a dominant 104-57 win over Regent. Kilian Brockhoff led with 20 points while Kaleb Spencer added a double-double, helping the Tribe maintain high-output offensive consistency. Their 87.2 points per game rank inside the national top 80, and their passing efficiency—fourth nationally in assists per game—fuels a high-tempo, ball-movement-centered system.

Perimeter shooting remains a strength, with the Tribe hitting 37.8 percent from three and ranking 32nd in makes per game. CJ Anthony and Toby Harris anchor the backcourt with reliable scoring and spacing. When William & Mary maintains rhythm across multiple actions, their spacing strains opponents that rely on slower, physical defensive structure.

Defensively, the Tribe emphasize contesting without fouling and forcing opponents into isolations. Their improved activity on the glass has led to more transition opportunities, supporting their up-tempo preference. Their ability to bounce back quickly from losses, such as their response after falling to St. John’s, reflects improved resilience and depth.

Rotational stability has also strengthened after several high-minute performances away from home. Additional competitive comparisons and early-season projections can be reviewed through the college basketball picks page and the NCAAB championship odds hub.

Key Matchup Table

Category	Advantage
Perimeter Shooting	William & Mary Tribe
Interior Efficiency	UTEP Miners
Tempo Control	William & Mary Tribe
Passing & Ball Movement	William & Mary Tribe

Betting Trends

UTEP enters with a competitive scoring profile but inconsistent defensive outcomes. Their ability to stay within reach often hinges on free-throw creation and efficient inside scoring. Their ATS results remain variable due to late-game scoring swings tied to pace.

William & Mary has been consistent against the spread, sitting 4-2 overall and proving reliable as a favorite. Their totals have trended upward due to pace and perimeter accuracy, though their defensive improvement in recent contests suggests potential under value in matchups with slower opponents.

Bettors seeking expanded trend analysis can view odds movement on the NCAAB scores and odds board and matchup previews through the NCAAB previews index. Additional analysis around player trends can be found at the John Wooden Award odds page.

The Lean

William & Mary’s pace advantage and superior perimeter shooting profile mesh well with UTEP’s slower, interior-based scoring model. The Tribe’s ball movement and three-point volume pose challenges for a Miners team that prefers to control possessions through physicality and free-throw generation. On a neutral floor, William & Mary’s spacing and scoring depth should create separation, particularly if UTEP falls behind early and is forced into a faster pace than preferred.

UTEP can remain competitive if Hall, West, and Watson sustain scoring efficiency and the Miners keep the game within a half-court structure. However, William & Mary’s ability to create clean looks across multiple actions gives them the stronger overall projection.

For additional game evaluations and matchup summaries across Monday’s card, bettors can explore the NCAAB previews page.

Projected Final Score: William & Mary Tribe 82, UTEP Miners 74
Best Spread Pick: William & Mary Tribe -1.5
Total Lean: Under 157.5

Why You Need Expert Picks

Nonconference matchups with contrasting pace profiles require deeper evaluation into possession control, shot-quality indicators, and turnover probability. The Handicappers Leaderboard on the college basketball picks portal highlights top-performing analysts who specialize in projecting efficiency trends across neutral-site contests.

Supplementary analysis from resources such as the NCAAB teams directory and player-performance hubs like the John Wooden Award odds page help identify rotational edges that influence spreads in fast-paced matchups.