Table of Contents
Match Facts
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Matchup | Chicago Blackhawks at Toronto Maple Leafs |
| Date | Tuesday night |
| Venue | Scotiabank Arena (Toronto) |
| Toronto focus | Closing games after recent third-period breakdowns |
| Chicago focus | Replacing Connor Bedard’s offense by committee |
| Recent meeting | Chicago won 3-2 in the last matchup (Nov. 15) |
For roster context and lineup depth, use NHL teams.
Line and Odds
- Moneyline: Toronto is expected to be a strong home favorite
- Puck line: Toronto -1.5 is the typical plus-money angle; Chicago +1.5 is the common “keep it close” side
- Total: usually priced in the 6.0 to 6.5 range for this type of matchup
Toronto’s price is less about “who’s better” and more about “how much Chicago loses without Bedard.” The Leafs can control long stretches at home, but their recent problem is game management late, which matters for puck-line bettors. If Toronto plays a clean third period and stays out of scramble defense, the talent gap shows. If the Leafs loosen up with a lead again, the door stays open for Chicago to hang around.
Check the latest numbers and market movement at NHL scores and odds.
Movement Matchup
This matchup is shaped by urgency versus opportunity. Toronto is trying to correct a very specific flaw: when the game tightens in the third period, their puck decisions and defensive spacing have slipped, and opponents have taken control of the tempo. Expect a more direct Leafs approach, with simpler exits, fewer high-risk east-west plays at the offensive blue line, and more emphasis on managing the puck above the dots.
Chicago’s opportunity is to make this uncomfortable early and then lean into Toronto’s recent nerves late. Without Bedard, the Blackhawks’ best path is to win shifts through forecheck pressure, draw penalties, and turn the game into a grind where one or two momentum swings can decide it. If Chicago can keep it close into the final 10 minutes, Toronto’s “close-out” issue becomes the headline again.
Breakdown Injury Reports
Toronto Maple Leafs
| Player | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Woll | Questionable | Lower-body injury; possible return |
| Anthony Stolarz | Out | Upper-body injury |
| Chris Tanev | Out | Upper-body injury |
| Brandon Carlo | Out | Foot injury |
| Matias Maccelli | Day-to-day | Illness |
| Marshall Rifai | Out | Long-term injured reserve |
Chicago Blackhawks
| Player | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Connor Bedard | Out | Upper-body injury (injured reserve) |
| Nick Foligno | Out | Hand injury (injured reserve) |
Toronto Maple Leafs Recent performance
The Leafs have shown they can build leads, but the last two games highlighted a recurring issue: their third period has lacked urgency and structure. In back-to-back spots, they gave opponents the driver’s seat late, and once momentum flipped, Toronto didn’t respond fast enough with the type of hard, simple hockey that protects a lead.
The good news for Toronto is that this is fixable without reinventing the team. Cleaner puck play, better changes, and a stronger commitment to winning the first battle below the goal line can stabilize the third period quickly. At home, the Leafs also get the benefit of last change, which helps Craig Berube manage matchups and keep his preferred defenders away from extended shifts against Chicago’s speed.
Chicago Blackhawks Recent performance
Chicago is walking into a difficult spot because Bedard isn’t just their leading scorer, he’s the engine that makes their top line dangerous every shift. Without him, the Blackhawks need more “five-man offense” and more pucks to the net, because the easy scoring that comes from elite creation won’t be there.
There are still ways for Chicago to compete. Their young call-ups and depth forwards can bring pace, and their best stretches usually come when they keep shifts short and play north. If they spend too much time defending, it becomes a long night, because the margin without Bedard is thin: fewer rush chances, fewer power-play threats, and fewer ways to erase mistakes.
Betting Insights and Trends
Toronto is likely to come out with a “get right” mindset in the third period specifically, which often shows up as a more conservative game state with a lead: fewer risky pinches, fewer turnovers at the offensive blue line, and a heavier emphasis on puck placement. That can help Toronto’s win probability but doesn’t always translate to covering a big puck line.
For Chicago, the Bedard absence changes how they score. The Blackhawks need second-chance offense, drawn penalties, and opportunistic finishing. If Toronto stays disciplined, Chicago’s scoring path narrows. If the Leafs take penalties or get loose with the puck late again, the Blackhawks can still manufacture a one-goal game.
If you’re weighing markets, the best approach is to pick a script and stay consistent with it. For general market education and how to choose between moneyline, puck line, totals, and team totals, use the NHL betting guide.
Best bet and Prediction
Best bet: Maple Leafs moneyline.
This is the best bet because it captures the strongest edge without requiring Toronto to win by margin. Chicago is missing Bedard, which removes a major chunk of their reliable offense, and Toronto’s biggest issue lately has been protecting leads rather than creating them. The moneyline lets you bet the talent and home-ice advantage while avoiding the added risk of Toronto’s recent late-game volatility.
Prediction: Maple Leafs 4, Blackhawks 2.
Handicapper section
If you’re building a small card, keep it simple and script-aligned. A Toronto side pairs best with a tighter Leafs third period and lower chaos late. If Toronto jumps out early again, live angles should focus on whether the Leafs are actually controlling the neutral zone and managing puck touches in the final 15 minutes, not just the score.
For additional angles and alternative markets once lines settle, browse the slate at NHL picks.
For standings context around Toronto’s division race, use Atlantic Division odds and predictions.


