NFL Previews 
MLB Previews 
NBA Previews 
NHL Previews 
Soccer Previews 
Table of Contents
Team Spoon vs Team Coop Picks, Predictions and Odds: Can Team Spoon’s size control the showcase?
Team Spoon and Team Coop meet Saturday, July 25, 2026, in the AT&T WNBA All-Star Game at United Center in Chicago. Tipoff is scheduled for 8:30 p.m. ET on ABC and Disney+. This is not a normal regular-season handicap: the rosters were drafted from the league’s All-Star pool, the teams have no shared game sample, and minutes should be distributed more evenly than they are during the season. The main betting question is whether Team Spoon’s frontcourt power deserves a full-possession premium over Team Coop’s deeper collection of perimeter creators.
The broader WNBA picks and previews board usually turns on continuity, injuries, pace and price. Here, continuity is the weakest input, making the number especially important.
Ready for today’s action?
Browse picks for today’s games before they start.
Game Info: How much will the new All-Star format change the handicap?
- Game: Team Spoon vs Team Coop
- League/Competition: 2026 AT&T WNBA All-Star Game
- Date: Saturday, July 25, 2026
- Tipoff: 8:30 p.m. ET
- Arena: United Center
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
- Broadcast: ABC and Disney+
- Official designation: Team Spoon is the away side; Team Coop is the home side
- Coaches: Cheryl Reeve, Team Spoon; Becky Hammon, Team Coop
- Format note: Cynthia Cooper and Teresa Weatherspoon drafted 11-player rosters without regard to conference or position
The $100,000 charitable prize pool, split $70,000 to the winner’s organization and $30,000 to the runner-up’s, should add late-game competitiveness even though rotations will remain less predictable than in regular-season play.
Team Spoon vs Team Coop Odds: Is the favorite priced too aggressively?
DraftKings prices cited through Sports Illustrated were checked at 9:35 a.m. ET on July 25, 2026. Team Spoon was a 3.5-point favorite with a -170 moneyline, while Team Coop was +3.5 and +135. The total was 277.5 with standard -110 pricing on both sides. Those prices make Team Spoon the expected winner, but the spread asks the favorite to create separation in a game where star-heavy substitutions can flatten normal bench advantages. Readers comparing prices can use the ScoresAndStats guide on how betting odds work for implied-probability context.
| Team | Moneyline | Spread | Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team Spoon | -170 | -3.5 (-110) | Over 277.5 (-110) |
| Team Coop | +135 | +3.5 (-110) | Under 277.5 (-110) |
The -170 moneyline implies a 62.96% break-even probability, while +135 implies 42.55%. The 277.5 total is more than 20 points above last season’s number, so the market has already priced in an extreme scoring environment.
Head-to-Head and Recent Meetings: What can last year’s shootout really tell us?
These exact teams have never played because the rosters were drafted specifically for the 2026 event. The useful comparison is last year’s All-Star Game, when Team Collier beat Team Clark 151-131 for 282 combined points. That result cleared a 255.5 total comfortably, but it should be treated as format evidence rather than a predictive matchup trend. The 2026 teams have different creators, different frontcourt combinations and different coaching staffs.
| Date | Venue | Result | Spread/Total Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| July 19, 2025 | Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis | Team Collier 151, Team Clark 131 | 282 total points; over 255.5 |
Modern WNBA All-Star games can sustain extreme scoring, but one exhibition result cannot identify which 2026 roster will execute better late.
Team Spoon Recent Form: Does its roster profile support the favorite role?
Team Spoon’s profile starts with interior force. A’ja Wilson, Jonquel Jones, Aliyah Boston, Jessica Shepard, Nneka Ogwumike and Kiki Iriafen give Cheryl Reeve several ways to control the glass, finish through contact and punish smaller switching groups. Caitlin Clark, Olivia Miles and Courtney Williams can organize the offense, while Rhyne Howard and Allisha Gray provide shooting and secondary creation. That is a balanced roster rather than a one-style collection.
The concern is role overlap. Multiple interior scorers can compress spacing if the guards are not hitting early threes. Clark’s passing can offset that, but Wilson’s minutes may not be heavy enough to justify pricing Team Spoon like a conventional favorite.
Team Coop Recent Form: Can its guard depth create the better game script?
Team Coop is built to create advantages from the perimeter. Paige Bueckers, Kelsey Mitchell, Jackie Young, Marina Mabrey, Sonia Citron and Kahleah Copper can all attack a tilted defense, while Gabby Williams adds transition pressure and point-of-attack resistance. Breanna Stewart and Natasha Howard supply mobile frontcourt scoring, Angel Reese brings offensive-rebounding energy, and Dominique Malonga adds vertical size.
That roster shape fits an exhibition. Multiple guards can push pace, and Becky Hammon can keep creators on the floor through nearly every rotation. Team Coop may concede size, but it has a clean path to early threes and rim attacks. Defensive rebounding is the main weakness.
Starting Lineups and Rotation Matchup: Which group has the cleaner two-way balance?
The starting groups were not formally confirmed, so these are projections based on draft order and positional balance. Early All-Star substitutions reduce the opening five’s importance.
Projected Team Spoon Lineup
- Caitlin Clark — guard
- Olivia Miles — guard
- Jessica Shepard — forward
- Aliyah Boston — center/forward
- A’ja Wilson — center
Projected Team Coop Lineup
- Paige Bueckers — guard
- Kelsey Mitchell — guard
- Gabby Williams — forward
- Natasha Howard — forward
- Breanna Stewart — forward
Team Spoon’s projected starters have superior interior size and a natural pick-and-roll organizer in Clark. Team Coop’s projected group has more switchability and more players comfortable creating off one or two dribbles. Once the benches enter, Team Coop can maintain perimeter pressure with Young, Mabrey, Citron and Copper, while Team Spoon can keep pounding the glass with Jones, Ogwumike and Iriafen. The game may swing less on starters than on which coach finds a five-player group willing to defend in transition during the final six minutes.
Injuries and Player Availability: Which late status matters most?
Kelsey Plum was replaced on Team Coop by Kahleah Copper after Plum was ruled out, so Copper is the relevant replacement in the final roster. Paige Bueckers returned recently from a head injury and was available for the event, while Caitlin Clark entered All-Star weekend managing a lingering back issue that influenced her decision not to participate in the three-point contest. Her game participation remained part of the official Team Spoon roster.
These temporary All-Star teams do not have approved ScoresAndStats injury pages. Any limitation on Clark would shift creation to Miles and Williams, while Team Coop’s guard depth offers more insulation against one perimeter player being limited.
Key Matchup Factors: Will frontcourt size or perimeter creation decide it?
First, possession creation. Team Coop has more ball-handlers who can generate a useful shot without a designed set. That matters in an All-Star game, where practice time is limited and continuity is low.
Second, rebounding. Team Spoon has the clearest structural edge on the glass. Wilson, Jones, Boston, Shepard and Ogwumike can create second chances and slow Team Coop’s transition game if they control defensive rebounds.
Third, lineup flexibility. Team Coop can play small, switch across several positions and keep shooting on the floor. Team Spoon can answer with size, but some big combinations may trade spacing for rebounding.
Fourth, fourth-quarter intent. The charitable prize pool gives both teams a reason to tighten rotations late. A close game favors the underdog spread because Team Coop has enough late-clock creators to avoid empty possessions.
Alternative Bets: Is Team Coop worth a small moneyline look?
Team Coop Moneyline
Team Coop +135 is a reasonable secondary look for bettors who prefer an outright result to taking points. The price implies a 42.55% break-even probability. My estimated win probability is closer to 46%, reflecting Team Coop’s perimeter depth, flexible closing lineups and the high variance of an exhibition game. The moneyline is playable only at +130 or better. The risk is Team Spoon owning the paint and offensive glass for long stretches, which would reduce the number of transition possessions Team Coop needs.
Best Bet: Does the underdog have enough shot creation to stay inside the number?
Best Bet: Team Coop +3.5 at -110. The price was available at DraftKings when checked at 9:35 a.m. ET on July 25, 2026. At -110, the implied break-even probability is 52.38%. I estimate Team Coop covers roughly 56% of the time, leaving a modest but defensible edge in a volatile event. The playable range is Team Coop +3 or better at -115 or lower; at +2.5, the cushion is too thin for this format.
First, Team Coop has more independent perimeter creators, valuable with little practice time. Second, Hammon can replace one guard with another without changing the pace-and-spacing plan. Third, All-Star substitutions and hot shooting make it difficult for a small favorite to hold separation.
The expected script is fast and offense-heavy, with Team Spoon doing more damage inside and Team Coop answering through transition, pull-up shooting and drive-and-kick possessions. The main risk is the glass. If Wilson, Jones and Boston generate repeated second chances while Team Coop misses from outside, the favorite can separate. Even with that risk, taking the points is preferable to paying -170 on a temporary roster in a format with limited continuity.
Final Prediction: Which team finishes the night with more late-game options?
Team Spoon has the best interior collection and the strongest individual two-way anchor in Wilson, but Team Coop has the cleaner perimeter rotation and more ways to create offense without a set play. That balance should keep the game inside one possession deep into the fourth quarter. The projected scoring environment is high, yet the market’s 277.5 total already demands another near-record pace, so the side offers the better value.
