NFL Previews 
MLB Previews 
NBA Previews 
NHL Previews 
Soccer Previews 
Table of Contents
Seattle Seahawks vs Tennessee Titans Picks, Predictions and Odds: How much does starter usage matter?
The Seattle Seahawks visit the Tennessee Titans in the final game of NFL preseason Week 2. Tennessee is favored because its expected quarterback and starter usage is materially stronger than Seattle’s. Cam Ward is expected to receive an extended first-half look after the Titans played their starters for roughly 20 snaps in the opener. Seattle’s established starter, Sam Darnold, did not play in Week 1, leaving Drew Lock and Jalen Milroe to handle evaluation reps. The preseason handicap starts with playing time, so the central question is whether Tennessee’s early advantage is enough to overcome the volatility of second-half depth.
Game Info: Does the joint-practice setup reduce veteran snaps?
- Game: Seattle Seahawks at Tennessee Titans
- League: NFL, Preseason Week 2
- Date: Sunday, August 23, 2026
- Kickoff: 8:00 p.m. ET
- Venue: Nissan Stadium, Nashville, Tennessee
- Designation: Seattle away, Tennessee home
- Expected quarterback plan: Seattle led by Drew Lock and Jalen Milroe; Tennessee led by Cam Ward with backups behind him
- Preparation: The clubs held a joint practice in Nashville on Friday
Nissan Stadium is outdoors, but the current weather picture does not point to wind as a major passing or kicking constraint. More important is the joint-practice context. Both teams received competitive work against the opponent two days before kickoff, which can reduce the need to expose veteran starters during the exhibition itself. That effect matters most for Seattle, whose staff already protected many established players in the opener.
Seattle Seahawks vs Tennessee Titans Odds: Has the move toward Tennessee gone too far?
| Team | Moneyline | Point Spread | Game Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seattle Seahawks | +175 | +4.5 (-110) | Over 38 (-110) |
| Tennessee Titans | -205 | -4.5 (-110) | Under 38 (-110) |
Prices were checked the morning of August 23. Tennessee opened much shorter, around -1.5 to -2.5 depending on the market, and has moved to -4.5 as expectations around starter usage and quarterback rotation became clearer. The total has drifted from roughly 38.5 toward 38. That is a meaningful preseason adjustment. Bettors can confirm the live number on the ScoresAndStats NFL odds board; at this point, the spread has already priced in a substantial portion of Tennessee’s early-game edge.
Head-to-Head and Series History: Does recent regular-season history matter in August?
Recent Seahawks-Titans regular-season results have limited value because this game is being driven by evaluation plans rather than the regular-season depth chart. Seattle won 30-24 in Nashville during the 2025 regular season, but that involved a different competitive setting, full-game starter usage and game-planning priorities that do not translate cleanly to preseason Week 2.
The more useful history is coaching behavior during this preseason. Seattle held out many established starters in its opener, while Tennessee used its first units for approximately 20 snaps. Both clubs also chose a joint practice as a major evaluation point. That makes projected playing time, not franchise head-to-head history, the more relevant comparison.
Seattle Seahawks Recent Form: Can the backup offense create more explosive plays?
Seattle lost its preseason opener 17-7 to Dallas after scoring on the first drive and then going scoreless for the final three-and-a-half quarters. The Seahawks finished with 156 total yards, including only 49 net passing yards, and allowed three sacks. Lock completed 9 of 13 passes for 40 yards and one touchdown. Milroe went 5 of 8 for 36 yards, added 36 rushing yards on five carries and absorbed all three sacks.
That profile explains why Seattle’s full-game offense is difficult to trust. Milroe’s legs add a legitimate explosive element, but the passing game did not create chunk gains and the backup protection was stressed. The Seahawks also failed on both fourth-down attempts. In a preseason setting, that can change quickly as combinations shift, but the current evidence suggests Seattle is more likely to create points through quarterback movement and short fields than through sustained dropback passing.
Tennessee Titans Recent Form: Will the opening-drive formula hold up?
Tennessee beat San Francisco 19-13 in its opener and showed a clearer first-unit plan. The Titans used their starters for roughly 20 plays. Ward completed 5 of 12 passes for 57 yards, but the opening possession was a 95-yard touchdown drive capped by Tony Pollard. After that, the passing game stalled, and Tennessee’s scoring was carried by four Joey Slye field goals.
The positive development came in Friday’s joint practice, where Ward was charted by the team site at 22 of 28 across 7-on-7 and team periods and finished a two-minute drive with a red-zone touchdown. That does not count as game production, but it supports the idea that Tennessee wants meaningful work from Ward and the first offense. The concern is protection depth. Once the starters came out against San Francisco, backup tackle play was less secure, which matters if Seattle’s younger edge defenders can force the second-half quarterbacks off schedule.
Quarterback and Offensive Matchup: Is Cam Ward’s extended workload the decisive edge?
Start with the quarterback and the protection in front of him. Tennessee has the clearest early-game advantage because Ward is the regular-season starter and is expected to get an extended runway. His 5-of-12 opener was uneven, yet the first drive showed that the Titans can lean on the run game and play-action structure before asking him to create. Friday’s joint-practice performance was also cleaner, especially in the red zone and two-minute period.
Seattle’s approach is more developmental. Lock is the experienced No. 2 and Milroe supplies mobility, but Darnold’s absence from the preseason opener established the staff’s willingness to protect the regular-season starter. Lock and Milroe combined for only 76 gross passing yards against Dallas. Milroe’s running ability can stress Tennessee’s backup contain rules, but Seattle needs better protection and more downfield separation before the offense deserves an aggressive scoring projection. That mismatch between early-game quarterback quality and late-game variance is why the total is more attractive than laying a large preseason spread.
Injuries, Projected Starters and Availability: Which depth concerns matter most?
Seattle Seahawks Key Projected Starters
- Drew Lock, QB — expected to handle major evaluation reps; monitor the Seahawks injury report for late changes
- Jalen Milroe, QB — expected rotational role with designed-run value
- Seattle backup offensive line — central evaluation group after allowing three sacks in the opener
- Young edge defenders — important against Tennessee’s second-unit protection
Tennessee Titans Key Projected Starters
- Cam Ward, QB — listed first on the unofficial depth chart; monitor the Titans injury report for late changes
- Dan Moore Jr., LT and JC Latham, RT — projected first-unit tackles
- Austin Schlottmann, C — listed with the first unit on the latest unofficial depth chart
- Calvin Ridley and Wan’Dale Robinson, WR — top receiving options on the depth chart
The preseason does not provide the same standard injury-report signal as the regular season, so the important distinction is between roster status and intended workload. Tennessee’s current unofficial depth chart lists Ward first at quarterback with Mitchell Trubisky behind him, but backup quarterback health and last-minute veteran rest decisions can alter the second-half projection. Seattle has also used camp and preseason reps to evaluate younger players rather than maximize veteran snaps. That uncertainty is one reason not to treat the current -4.5 like a normal regular-season favorite.
Key Matchup Factors: Can Seattle survive Tennessee’s starter-heavy first half?
The first key is Tennessee’s first 20 to 30 offensive snaps. If Ward and the first line recreate the opener’s 95-yard drive, Seattle may spend the game chasing. The second is Seattle’s backup protection. Dallas held the Seahawks to 49 net passing yards, and Milroe was sacked three times. Tennessee does not need a dominant pass rush for the under to benefit; repeated negative plays and long third downs are enough.
The third factor is special teams. Slye made four field goals in Tennessee’s opener, including three from at least 50 yards, which showed that stalled drives can still become points. That helps the Titans but can also suppress touchdown variance and support an under. Finally, the coaching split matters. Tennessee has a new staff under Robert Saleh and Brian Daboll with incentive to give Ward real timing work, while Seattle’s championship roster has less reason to expose established starters.
Your next pick starts here.
Check the board, compare the options, and find the picks you like.
Alternative Bets: Is Seattle plus 4.5 the better way to fade the move?
Seattle Seahawks +4.5 at -110
Seattle +4.5 is the natural price-fade after Tennessee’s move from the opener. The Seahawks can lose the first-unit portion and still cover if Lock and Milroe are more effective against Tennessee’s second and third groups. The risk is that Seattle’s protection issues persist and the offense again spends long stretches without a scoring drive.
Tennessee Titans Moneyline -205
Tennessee’s moneyline strips away the margin requirement and fits the expectation that Ward and more first-unit players will create an early lead. At -205, however, the implied probability is 67.2%, which is expensive for a preseason game in which second-half substitutions can erase an early edge. It is cleaner than laying -4.5 but not attractive enough to be the primary recommendation.
Best Bet: Is the full-game under still playable at 38?
Best Bet: Under 38 at -110
At the morning price on August 23, -110 implies a 52.4% break-even probability. My estimate is approximately 56%, with the under playable at 38 down to -115 and still worth consideration at 37.5 only if the price is -105 or better. The first reason is Seattle’s current offensive profile: 156 total yards and 49 net passing yards in the opener, with three sacks allowed. The second is Tennessee’s scoring distribution. The Titans reached 19 points against San Francisco, but 12 came from field goals, showing how a productive first unit can still fail to create touchdown-heavy scoring. The third is substitution risk: once Tennessee’s starters leave, backup protection and quarterback continuity become less reliable, while Seattle is already planning around evaluation reps rather than its regular-season offense.
The strongest counterargument is Ward’s projected workload. If Tennessee lets him play close to a half and the first offense carries Friday’s joint-practice rhythm into the game, the Titans can score enough early to put the total under pressure. Seattle also has a mobile quarterback in Milroe who can create broken-play explosives. Even with those risks, the number still leaves room for a 20-14 or 23-13 type of finish. The total is a better match for the expected game script than chasing a favorite that has already moved several points.
Final Prediction: Can Tennessee win without clearing the total?
Final Score Prediction: Seattle Seahawks 14, Tennessee Titans 23
Tennessee should own the cleaner early possessions because Ward is expected to get more meaningful work behind the first unit, while Seattle remains focused on Lock, Milroe and depth evaluation. The best bet is Under 38 at -110, playable at that number to -115. The main risk is Tennessee’s starter-heavy first half producing multiple touchdowns before the substitutions begin. If the game reaches halftime in a normal preseason scoring range, the later rotations favor a slower finish and make the under the strongest way to attack the matchup.
